The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for vascular disease, which he claimed was secondary to his service-connected bilateral trench foot. The case is being remanded for further development and consideration.
The deciding factor: The evidence does not support a finding that the veteran's vascular disease is related to his service-connected trench foot.
- Claimed conditions
- vascular disease
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 26, 2001
- Citation
- 0102314
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0102314.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the matter for further development, specifically requesting addendum medical opinions to address the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed bilateral pes planus and other orthopedic foot disorders, as well as lower extremity peripheral vascular disease.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for aortic valve insufficiency and vascular disease, to include as secondary to hypertension, due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for asthma, end stage renal disease, myocardial infarction, hypertension, and vascular disease. The evidence did not show these conditions were incurred in service or within one year of separation.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the veteran's claims for service connection for vascular disease and headaches. The Board found that the VA medical opinions provided were inadequate and required further development.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.