The Board has determined that new and material evidence has not been submitted to reopen the veteran's claim of entitlement to service connection for a right leg disability, as the evidence does not demonstrate an association between the claimed disability and service.
The deciding factor: The evidence by itself or in connection with previously assembled evidence is not significant enough to warrant reopening the previously denied claims.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Leg Disability
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 29, 2001
- Citation
- 0102406
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0102406.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's appeal for service connection of a sleep disorder is dismissed. An initial evaluation of 70 percent, but no higher, is granted for major depressive disorder. Service connection for lumbar spine and bilateral leg disabilities remains remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to new evidence received, and because of potential interrelatedness with other conditions. The Veteran's MS is being examined again, along with her leg disabilities and psychiatric disorder.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for right hip, lower back, and right leg disabilities due to a lack of medical evidence on record.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for prostate cancer and its secondary disabilities due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors, including failure to obtain private medical records and an inadequate VA opinion. The appellant is seeking compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for prostate cancer and service connection for various disabilities as secondary to his prostate cancer.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.