Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board found that the June 1987 rating decision contained clear and unmistakable error in determining that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen a claim of service connection for a nervous disorder. The veteran's claim should be reopened.

The deciding factor: The submitted evidence linked the veteran's psychiatric disability to his service in Vietnam, which was previously denied due to lack of timely submission of new and material evidence.

Claimed conditions
nervous disorder
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
January 29, 2001
Citation
0102446

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0102446.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.