The Board has determined that new and material evidence had not been presented to reopen the veteran's claims of entitlement to service connection for chest and spinal injuries, as well as a concussion. The case is being remanded back to the RO for further review considering all information associated with the claims folder subsequent to the October 1999 supplemental statement of the case.
The deciding factor: The Board found that new evidence had not been presented to reopen the veteran's service connection claims, and thus the case was returned to the RO for additional consideration.
- Claimed conditions
- residuals of chest and spinal injuries, residuals of a concussion
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- February 13, 2001
- Citation
- 0104447
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0104447.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection have been remanded due to insufficient evidence of a current disability in some cases and the need for further medical evaluation in others.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for residuals of a concussion, finding that the Veteran's condition had its onset in and is related to his service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remanded the claim for service connection of residuals of a concussion. The Veteran's claim was denied in December 2022, and the Board is sending it back to the AOJ for further action.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for residuals of a concussion and nerve impingement of the right upper extremity, finding that there was no credible evidence linking these conditions to active duty service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.