The veteran's service-connected generalized seizure disorder is rated at 80 percent, and the Board finds that this rating is not warranted for an increased disability evaluation.
The deciding factor: The veteran has presented evidence of more than 10 minor seizures weekly but does not meet the criteria for a 100% schedular rating due to grand mal seizure activity. The overall record reflects grand mal seizure activity approximating the criteria for an 80% rating, which is already assigned.
- Claimed conditions
- Generalized Seizure Disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 80%
- Decision date
- February 15, 2001
- Citation
- 0104811
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0104811.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the Veteran's claims for Traumatic Brain Injury and Generalized Seizure Disorder due to inadequate VA examinations, new evidence added since the last decision, and potential Army Reserve service.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected generalized seizure disorder is rated at 20 percent since March 29, 2006. The Board denied the claim for a higher rating and also found that he did not meet the criteria for TDIU.
- Granted
The Board has reopened the claim for service connection for generalized seizure disorder based on new and material evidence. The veteran's preexisting generalized seizure disorder was aggravated during his military service, warranting service connection.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.