Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The RO's June 1996 decision denying outpatient dental treatment was found to be clearly and unmistakably erroneous, and the veteran is now eligible for VA outpatient dental treatment. The claim for compensation for extracted tooth number 8 remains pending.

The deciding factor: The RO failed to provide proper notice in rendering the June 1996 rating determination, which resulted in a clear and unmistakable error.

Claimed conditions
extracted tooth number 8
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 2, 2001
Citation
0106343

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0106343.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.