The veteran's claim for payment or reimbursement of the cost of unauthorized medical services provided from February 24, 1998 through March 1, 1998 is granted as he was undergoing treatment in a medical emergency and VA facilities were not feasibly available.
The deciding factor: Medical evidence shows that the veteran underwent triple coronary artery bypass surgery during a medical emergency where transfer to a VA facility would have been medically unwise due to his condition.
- Claimed conditions
- Psychosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 5, 2001
- Citation
- 0106475
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0106475.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection are remanded due to the need for further development, including verification of in-service stressors and toxic exposure assessments. The Board also requests a VA examination to address the etiology of his diagnosed mental health conditions and vertigo.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the overpayment of VA compensation in the amount of $11,241.56 is not valid due to a processing delay and has granted the Veteran's appeal.
- Granted
The Board granted a Level 2 stipend under the PCAFC due to the Veteran's need for continuous supervision and instruction, as he suffers from hallucinations, anxiety, depression, suicidal ideation, and psychosis.
- Dismissed
The Board has dismissed the appeal regarding earlier effective dates for special monthly compensation (SMC) based on need of regular aid and attendance, as no such claims were continuously pursued after the benefit was granted in a September 2019 rating decision.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.