The veteran's left eye vision issues are not considered service-connected due to lack of evidence of an acquired ocular disability.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence of any acquired ocular disability relative to the left eye, and the preponderance of the evidence is against the claim for service connection.
- Claimed conditions
- left eye visual impairment
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 12, 2001
- Citation
- 0107302
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0107302.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for bilateral myasthenia gravis with right eye ptosis was denied in November 2009 due to lack of evidence showing the condition was incurred during or aggravated by service.,Claims for left eye disability, facial neurological disability, and urinary disability were also raised but not adjudicated as they occurred after the effective date of July 8, 2011.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's left eye visual impairment has worsened, and he cannot see even with his glasses. He needs a magnifying glass to read text and can't write checks due to the condition. The Board is remanding the case for an examination to determine the current severity of his condition.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected eye disabilities do not cause marked interference with employment or frequent hospitalizations, and thus the criteria for an extraschedular disability rating have not been met.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.