Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The veteran is seeking an effective date prior to March 23, 1998 for a compensable evaluation of his service-connected tinnitus. He also argues that the RO committed clear and unmistakable error in failing to assign a 10% evaluation for his tinnitus in October 1981.

The deciding factor: The veteran's claim involves both an effective date issue and a potential CUE claim regarding the failure to grant a rating in October 1981.

Claimed conditions
tinnitus
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
March 20, 2001
Citation
0108175

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0108175.

What this means for you

A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.