The Board has remanded the case due to additional evidence developed and issues related to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a bilateral eye disability, as well as the need to determine if the appellant's Notice of Disagreement was filed by an authorized person.
The deciding factor: The Board has determined that the case requires additional development due to new evidence and issues related to compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a bilateral eye disability, as well as the need to determine if the appellant's Notice of Disagreement was filed by an authorized person.
- Claimed conditions
- post-traumatic left sciatic neuropathy, anxiety neurosis, post-operative gastrectomy, incisional hernia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- March 30, 2001
- Citation
- 0109464
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0109464.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for a new VA examination to address functional impairment and to determine whether the Veteran has an incisional inguinal hernia.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for additional disability of the abdomen as residuals of a kidney surgery, including abdominal wall laxity and incisional hernia.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issues of CUE in the June 1972 and March 1991 rating decisions for initial adjudication by the AOJ.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal of the July 1980 rating decision, finding that it did not commit an error in failing to adjudicate a claim for service connection for 'delayed stress reaction.' The July 1980 rating decision was found to be final and correct as applied at the time.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.