The Board has denied the veteran's claim of service connection for progressive muscular atrophy as due to Agent Orange exposure, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim on a direct basis. The RO also denied his claim of peripheral neuropathy.
The deciding factor: The claim was denied based on lack of new and material evidence to reopen the service connection on a direct basis.
- Claimed conditions
- progressive muscular atrophy
- How they argued it
- Presumptive (no nexus needed)
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- March 30, 2001
- Citation
- 0109609
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0109609.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to outstanding medical records and a need for an addendum opinion regarding the nature and etiology of the Veteran's claimed progressive muscular atrophy or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis of the hands.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's progressive muscular atrophy, COPD, and disability manifested by fatigue are all granted as service-connected.,Service connection is established for these conditions based on direct evidence of a relationship to active duty service.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to issues being inextricably intertwined, specifically the service connection for a low back disorder and the claim for service connection for progressive muscular atrophy. The claims will be readjudicated together.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for diabetes mellitus type II with erectile dysfunction was denied as the evidence did not show that he had been diagnosed and manifested to at least a 10 percent disability rating on or prior to May 8, 2001.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.