The Board is remanding the case to the RO for further development, including obtaining VA treatment records and medical opinions. The veteran's claim of reopening a service connection for a psychoneurotic disorder will be reconsidered.
The deciding factor: The decision is being remanded due to new evidence submitted by the veteran's attorney that has not been considered by the RO.
- Claimed conditions
- psychoneurotic disorder
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 9, 2001
- Citation
- 0110383
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0110383.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case to the RO for further development due to a lack of full statement of reasons and bases in the August 2003 decision, including VCAA compliance.
- Granted
The Board granted the reopening of a claim for service connection for a psychoneurotic disorder and denied claims for service connection for cardiac disorder and COPD.
- Granted
The Board has determined that new and material evidence has been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for a psychoneurotic disorder. The veteran's claims for service connection for cardiac disorder and COPD were not well-grounded at the time of the 1998 rating decision, but are now considered on their merits.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the veteran's current psychoneurotic disorder is related to his service in World War II, and thus grants service connection for this condition. The claim for an increased rating for peptic ulcer disease will be addressed in a separate decision.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.