Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The veteran's claim for an increased rating for his scar was denied by the RO, as there is no evidence of ulceration or limitation of function that would warrant a higher evaluation.

The deciding factor: There was no evidence of ulceration or breakdown of skin, nor any indication of disfigurement. The scar itself was neither tender to palpation nor raised, and did not cause any limitation of function.

Claimed conditions
residuals of a gunshot wound, scar in the right pelvic region
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 16, 2001
Citation
0111008

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0111008.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.