Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Denied

The Board denied entitlement to increased ratings for the veteran's hepatitis, finding that the evidence did not support a rating in excess of 10 percent prior to April 30, 1996 or in excess of 30 percent as of and subsequent to April 30, 1996.

The deciding factor: The Board found that the veteran's hepatitis was rated based on minimal liver damage with mild gastrointestinal disturbance since April 30, 1996, when he began Interferon therapy. The evidence did not support a higher rating prior to this date.

Claimed conditions
hepatitis
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
April 26, 2001
Citation
0112022

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0112022.

What this means for you

A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.