The Board has determined that the veteran's claims for earlier effective dates for increased ratings of his bilateral knee disabilities are denied. The RO established service connection and assigned a noncompensable rating in October 1991, which became final due to lack of appeal. The RO received the veteran's claim for an increased rating on March 18, 1999, but found no communication indicating entitlement to such increase within one year before that date.
The deciding factor: The effective dates for the awards cannot be earlier than February 25, 1999 for the right knee and March 18, 1999 for the left knee due to lack of evidence showing an increase in disability status within a year prior to those dates.
- Claimed conditions
- patellofemoral arthrosis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- April 30, 2001
- Citation
- 0112277
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0112277.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient evidence regarding the etiology of the Veteran's right knee disorders. The case will be reviewed with a new examination and additional medical records obtained.
- Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral knee disability, diagnosed as patellofemoral pain syndrome and patellofemoral arthrosis, was aggravated during his period of active service. Therefore, service connection for this condition is granted.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.