The Board has determined that the veteran's osteomyelitis was initially active in service and subsequently cured by removal of affected bone. Therefore, a five-year 20 percent historical evaluation is granted effective from April 1, 1970.
The deciding factor: Osteomyelitis was initially active during service and was cured by removal of the affected bone during VA hospitalization in December 1969.
- Claimed conditions
- Osteomyelitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 4, 2001
- Citation
- 0112768
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0112768.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, hypertension, and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for osteomyelitis to correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to unresolved medical questions and potential negligence in post-operative care, which may affect the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board has denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that no disability resulting from injury or disease incurred in or aggravated by service contributed substantially or materially to his death.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that another remand is necessary to obtain an addendum opinion from a qualified endocrinologist and thoracic surgeon/cardiologist regarding the Veteran's contentions about diabetes management, UTI treatment, and stent use. The claim will be readjudicated after this additional development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.