The Board has decided to remand the case for further development due to recent legislation requiring additional assistance in determining service connection.
The deciding factor: Recent legislation mandates that VA provide assistance to develop all facts pertinent to a claim, including medical examinations when such examination may substantiate entitlement to benefits.
- Claimed conditions
- Conversion disorder, Paralysis of the lower extremities
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 4, 2001
- Citation
- 0112778
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0112778.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for payment of non-VA medical services provided on April 19, 2016 is denied because the care was not pre-approved and did not qualify as emergency treatment. The Board found that a prudent layperson would not have expected a delay in seeking immediate medical attention to be hazardous to life or health.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete service records and need for further development regarding stressor events in service, psychiatric disability etiology, and evaluation of existing evidence. The Veteran's claims for PTSD and depression are being considered under direct service connection theory.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to inadequate opinions regarding the adverse reaction to VA supplied medication. A Veteran's Health Administration specialist opinion is needed to address whether the speech impairments, lower extremity weakness, and dystonic reaction were caused by the ingestion of Gabapentin or Dubutamine.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities prevented her from maintaining substantially gainful employment prior to November 3, 2016. The combined rating of the service-connected conditions is 90 percent, meeting the criteria for a TDIU.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.