The Board has remanded the case for additional development due to incomplete medical records and examination reports.
The deciding factor: Incomplete medical records and examination reports have been identified as a reason for remanding the case for further action.
- Claimed conditions
- renal cyst, residuals of testicular carcinoma with a right radical orchiectomy, residuals of small bowel obstruction
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 8, 2001
- Citation
- 0112937
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0112937.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board has granted service connection for a dilated aorta as secondary to the Veteran's service-connected hypertension, but denied service connection for a renal cyst condition. The denial of the renal cyst claim is due to insufficient evidence linking it to the Veteran's service-connected hypertension.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's kidney condition, including hydronephrosis and/or renal cyst, is remanded for further review due to a failure to obtain an adequate medical opinion regarding the etiology of his condition. The examiner must consider all potential exposures, including contaminated water at Camp Lejeune and fuels as a result of his MOS as a bulk fuel man.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the Veteran's claims for service connection for kidney disability, thyroid cancer, and a rating in excess of 30 percent for PTSD due to inadequate medical opinions and failure to obtain VA examinations.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal for a higher rating for peritoneal adhesions with small intestine involvement status post laparotomy was denied. The Board also found that the claim of service connection for renal cyst, as secondary to service-connected peritoneal adhesions, needs further examination and remanded.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.