The Board found that the veteran's service-connected disabilities do not warrant increased evaluations, as they did not meet the criteria for higher ratings under the applicable VA rating schedule.
The deciding factor: The objective evidence of record did not show actual loss of use of the right foot or active infection in the past five years for osteomyelitis, and the veteran's amputation was found to be improvable by a prosthesis. The multiple wounds were also found to have no actual loss of use.
- Claimed conditions
- Amputation of the left leg below the knee with prosthesis, Multiple wounds of the right foot and lower leg, Osteomyelitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- May 11, 2001
- Citation
- 0113446
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0113446.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for an acquired psychiatric disorder, hypertension, and compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for osteomyelitis to correct pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to unresolved medical questions and potential negligence in post-operative care, which may affect the claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151.
- Denied
The Board has denied the claim for service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that no disability resulting from injury or disease incurred in or aggravated by service contributed substantially or materially to his death.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that another remand is necessary to obtain an addendum opinion from a qualified endocrinologist and thoracic surgeon/cardiologist regarding the Veteran's contentions about diabetes management, UTI treatment, and stent use. The claim will be readjudicated after this additional development.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.