Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Granted

The Board found no clear and unmistakable error in the original decision awarding compensation benefits for additional disability due to a hemorrhoidectomy performed at a VA medical facility, thus upholding the grant of benefits.

The deciding factor: The RO's October 1999 determination that the veteran's residuals were necessary consequences of the surgery did not constitute clear and unmistakable error based on the factual record as it now stands.

Claimed conditions
rectal bleeding, perianal abscess
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
10%
Decision date
May 21, 2001
Citation
0114120

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0114120.

What this means for you

A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.