The veteran died from apparent peritonitis, which the VA physician opined was likely related to a bowel perforation. The death certificate and medical records do not support the claim that the veteran underwent colonscopic examination two days prior to his death.
The deciding factor: There is no evidence of a routine colonscopic examination on the date in question, and the VA physician's opinion is based on an unsupported account from the appellant.
- Claimed conditions
- Rectal carcinoma, Peritonitis
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 13, 2001
- Citation
- 0116126
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0116126.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board granted service connection for the cause of the Veteran's death, finding that her service-connected PTSD contributed to her developing ovarian cancer which led to peritonitis and ultimately caused her death.
- Denied
The Board denied DIC benefits, finding that VA did not cause the Veteran's death through negligence or error. The Veteran died from septic shock due to bowel perforation, which was a known risk of surgery but not caused by VA.
- Denied
The Veteran's death was due to peritonitis and perforated sigmoid diverticulitis, with significant conditions of COPD and stage IV esophageal cancer. The cause of these disabilities is not related to his military service or exposure to herbicides.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for a higher rate of SMC, for purposes of accrued benefits, was denied as the evidence did not support an assignment of an SMC rate in excess of the M-rate.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.