Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Remanded (sent back)

The Board has determined that a remand is required for another PTSD examination based on a full review of the claims file, to include a request for the examiner to dissociate the effects of the veteran's April 1993 stroke from his PTSD.

The deciding factor: The recent legislative changes require a thorough and contemporaneous examination which takes into account prior medical treatment records.

Claimed conditions
post-traumatic stress disorder
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 28, 2001
Citation
0117331

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0117331.

What this means for you

A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.