The Board denied the veteran's claim for service connection for postoperative prostate cancer, finding that it was not incurred or aggravated during service and could not be presumed to have been caused by exposure to ionizing radiation in service. The evidence did not support a conclusion that the prostate cancer resulted from such exposure.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not establish a link between the veteran's postoperative prostate cancer and his military service, including any potential exposure to ionizing radiation.
- Claimed conditions
- Postoperative Prostate Cancer
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- July 17, 2001
- Citation
- 0118564
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0118564.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected disabilities, including PTSD, right shoulder strain and DJD, postoperative prostate cancer, residuals of appendix surgery with scars, and erectile dysfunction, are rated at 90 percent combined. The Board finds that these conditions render the Veteran unemployable due to their severity and impact on his ability to work.
- Granted
The Veteran's postoperative prostate cancer is rated at 10 percent prior to May 3, 2011; 40 percent from May 3, 2011 to January 17, 2012; and 20 percent from January 17, 2012. The Veteran's bilateral hearing loss is not service-connected.
- Denied
The Board denied an increased evaluation for the veteran's postoperative prostate cancer, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on voiding dysfunction or erectile dysfunction. The RO had initially assigned a 20% evaluation and awarded special monthly compensation for loss of use of a creative organ due to erectile dysfunction.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.