The Board has granted a 10 percent disability rating for the veteran's residuals of a fracture of the left distal fibula, effective from June 26, 1998.
The deciding factor: The evidence showed that the veteran had a minimally displaced fracture of the left distal fibula with occasional pain in cold weather. The examiner noted no significant functional loss and endorsed the veteran's complaints of occasional pain during cold weather.
- Claimed conditions
- fracture of the left distal fibula
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 20, 2001
- Citation
- 0118982
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0118982.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his left ankle disability, which is rated at 30 percent under the provisions of Diagnostic Code 5262 (impairment of tibia and fibula), has been denied as there is no evidence of nonunion or malunion of the fibula with marked ankle disability, nor ankylosis of the ankle.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the appellant's claims for increased evaluations of his left distal fibula and brachial plexus injuries, finding that prior to May 2, 2005, there was no evidence showing restriction of motion or arthritis in the ankle. The claim for a higher evaluation after May 1, 2005, also failed.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded to the RO for additional development, including scheduling a videoconference hearing.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for residuals of fracture of the left distal fibula is being remanded due to a lack of substantial compliance with the Board's previous instructions, including obtaining an adequate and contemporaneous VA examination.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.