The veteran's claims for increased evaluations and effective dates were denied. The nonunion of the sternotomy incision was granted with a 20% disability rating, effective June 4, 1998. The incisional hernia claim was denied. The veteran's request for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for gout, atrophied right kidney with cyst, eye disorder, scars of the legs and chest, and impotence was also denied.
The deciding factor: The RO found no evidence to support the veteran's claims for increased evaluations or effective dates under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
- Claimed conditions
- Nonunion of sternotomy incision, Incisional hernia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 20%
- Decision date
- July 23, 2001
- Citation
- 0119060
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0119060.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the development previously ordered by the June 2018 remand is still necessary to adjudicate the appeals. As such, this case is being returned for further action.
- Granted
The Veteran's special monthly compensation at the statutory housebound rate is granted as of March 21, 2013. SMC based on need for regular aid and attendance of another person is also granted as of April 15, 2015.
- Dismissed
The appeal for restoration of a 20 percent rating for an incisional hernia is dismissed. The earlier effective date claim for SMC based on loss of use of the bilateral lower extremities is denied as it does not meet the criteria.
- Denied
The Veteran's incisional hernia is not considered to be the result of VA carelessness, negligence, or similar fault. The Board finds that the evidence does not support a finding that the hernia resulted from any event not reasonably foreseeable.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.