The Board has remanded the case for further development due to a need for additional medical examinations and records.
The deciding factor: The decision is being remanded because the veteran needs a thorough examination, including serology and skin tests, to determine the etiology of his left lung condition.
- Claimed conditions
- left lung disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- Agent Orange / herbicides
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- August 27, 2001
- Citation
- 0121627
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0121627.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the cases due to insufficient evidence regarding whether the Veteran's left lung disorder and left ankle disorder are related to his military service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied the reopening of the claim for service connection for a left lung disorder because no new and material evidence was submitted to support the claim.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Board denied service connection for migraine headaches, left lung disorder, lipomas, muscle deterioration disorder, and bone degeneration disorder. The Veteran's claims were not supported by evidence showing a direct link to his military service or exposure to contaminants.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal was remanded due to procedural issues, specifically the incorrect filing of a notice of disagreement (NOD) in the legacy system. The Board finds that VA waived this requirement and now requires an SOC for his claims.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.