The Board found that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen the claim for service connection for a gynecological disability, characterized as vaginal discharge, urinary tract infection, or female disorder. The RO determined there was no showing of a chronic female disorder or urinary tract infection during service.
The deciding factor: The veteran's complaints were found to be related to her service-connected kidney infection rather than a separate gynecological condition.
- Claimed conditions
- gynecological disability, female disorder, urinary tract infection
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 13, 2001
- Citation
- 0122423
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0122423.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for extreme fatigue, difficulty breathing, sepsis, and urinary tract infection due to incomplete records and a need for additional medical opinions.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is remanded for further development regarding the service connection claims for adjustment disorder, causalgia, and a gynecological disability. The rating for adjustment disorder remains denied.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case due to an inadequate medical opinion, and a new one must be provided.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for the cause of death, finding that there is no evidence to support a causal relationship between the Veteran's military service or VA treatment and his death.,The Board also denied DIC under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 and DIC under 38 U.S.C. § 1318, as there was no evidence of fault on the part of VA in the care provided to the Veteran.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.