The Board has found that no new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for a psychiatric disorder, including schizophrenia. The case is being remanded due to failure to hold a hearing as requested by the appellant in 1991, need for compliance with legal authority, and need for further development.
The deciding factor: The Board has found that no new and material evidence had been submitted to reopen the claim of service connection for a psychiatric disorder, including schizophrenia. The case is being remanded due to failure to hold a hearing as requested by the appellant in 1991, need for compliance with legal authority, and need for further development.
- Claimed conditions
- psychiatric disorder, to include schizophrenia
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 25, 2001
- Citation
- 0123247
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0123247.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Veteran's appeal was dismissed due to his death, and no effective date or rating is assigned as the claims are not adjudicated.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and needs to obtain additional information before deciding whether new evidence supports reopening the claim for service connection of a psychiatric disorder.
- Partly granted
The Board is remanding the case for scheduling a personal hearing before a Veterans Law Judge at the RO due to the veteran's and his attorney's failure to respond to previous requests for hearings.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to the need for additional development, including obtaining SSA records and providing proper notice regarding secondary service connection.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.