The veteran's appeal is being remanded for additional development, including obtaining VA examinations to address the relationship between his service and the claimed conditions.
The deciding factor: Additional evidence and development are needed as per the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000 (VCAA).
- Claimed conditions
- hydradenitis suppurative of the groin and buttocks with postoperative residuals, hematuria
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- September 25, 2001
- Citation
- 0123330
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0123330.
What this means for you
A remand sends an issue back for more development, often a new examination or missing records. It does not award the benefit or decide the final outcome. The original decision explains the additional work ordered.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's death was caused by radiation, but the cause of his hematuria and prostate cancer is under review. The Board finds that VA did not obtain a proper medical opinion regarding the relationship between in-service asbestos exposure and the Veteran's death.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's hematuria was incurred in service and is not aggravated by service, thus granting service connection for this condition.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded several issues related to the Veteran's claims, including hematuria, hiatal hernia, arrhythmia, left knee condition, and right knee condition. The remand requires additional examinations and opinions to address duty-to-assist errors in previous decisions.
- Whole decision: Dismissed
Entitlement to service connection for hematuria (claimed as kidney condition) is dismissed.,Entitlement to service connection for lower back condition is dismissed.,Entitlement to service connection for tinnitus is dismissed.,Entitlement to service connection for mood disorder is denied.,Entitlement to service connection for cervical spine condition is denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.