The veteran's claim for a higher rating for his service-connected shell fragment wound to the left hand is being remanded due to the need for additional development, including obtaining medical records and scheduling a VA examination. The issue of whether he should be awarded separate ratings for degenerative osteoarthrosis of the left interphalangeal joints is also pending.
The deciding factor: The claim requires further evidence and evaluation as per the Veterans Claims Assistance Act of 2000, which mandates that all claims are to be developed in a manner consistent with the new law.
- Claimed conditions
- shell fragment wound to the left hand, degenerative osteoarthrosis of the left interphalangeal joints
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 26, 2001
- Citation
- 0123428
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0123428.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's PTSD is rated at 50 percent since the effective date of service connection, but a higher rating is not warranted.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for an increased rating for his service-connected residuals of a shell fragment wound to the left hand is being remanded due to incomplete examination findings and additional development needed.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.