The Board denied reopening the appellant's claim for revocation of forfeiture of VA benefits due to lack of new and material evidence, as the submitted evidence was duplicative or did not substantially impact the issue.
The deciding factor: The submitted evidence is either duplicative of previously considered evidence or does not provide substantial new information regarding the appellant's service connection theory.
- Claimed conditions
- World War II service
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- October 17, 2001
- Citation
- 0124773
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0124773.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to non-compliance with previous directives, and further clarification is needed regarding the Appellant's spouse's service in World War II.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a need for additional evidentiary development regarding the appellant's deceased spouse's World War II service and its impact on her application for VA death benefits.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to concerns about verifying military service and determining whether an inquiry should have been forwarded to the Adjutant General, U.S. Army Human Resources Command.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case for further action due to a need to verify the appellant's husband's service in World War II and contact the appropriate service department.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.