Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Board dismissed the appeal because the veteran's substantive appeal was not timely filed with respect to his claim for an increased evaluation for right hallux limitus.

The deciding factor: The veteran did not file a timely substantive appeal within one year of receiving notification of the denial, as required by VA regulations.

Claimed conditions
right hallux limitus
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
October 29, 2001
Citation
0125442

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0125442.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.