The veteran's tendonitis of the left foot was not incurred in or aggravated by service.,Service connection for a periodontal disease for compensation purposes is not warranted.,Service connection for loss of teeth numbers 3 and 9 for compensation purposes is not warranted.,Service connection for periodontal disease for the purpose of receiving Class II VA outpatient treatment for a one-time correction of the disability is not warranted.,Service connection for loss of teeth numbers 3 and 9 for the purpose of receiving Class II VA outpatient treatment for a one-time correction of the disability is warranted.
The deciding factor: The preponderance of the evidence does not support a finding that tendonitis of the left foot was incurred in or aggravated by service.
- Claimed conditions
- Tendonitis of left foot, Periodontal disease, Loss of teeth numbers 3 and 9
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- November 8, 2001
- Citation
- 0126123
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0126123.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issues of entitlement to a compensable evaluation for fixed bridge dislocation and individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board denied service connection for periodontal disease, which was not considered a disability for VA compensation purposes. The claim for a higher rating for the seizure disorder was remanded.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The claims for compensation under 38 U.S.C. section 1151 for PTSD and service connection for periodontal disease are remanded due to a procedural issue regarding the Veteran's right to a pre-decisional hearing.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board dismissed the appeal for an increased rating and service connection claims as withdrawn or moot, denied service connection for polycythemia vera, and remanded claims for erectile dysfunction and hypertension.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.