The Board finds that the appellant's discharge from service was under dishonorable conditions due to willful and persistent misconduct, specifically unauthorized absence without leave for a period of 193 days. This constitutes a bar to VA benefits.
The deciding factor: The appellant's actions during service were consistent with 'willful and persistent' misconduct, leading to an 'other than honorable' discharge under dishonorable conditions.
- Claimed conditions
- Unauthorized absence, Violations of Article 91 (disobeying lawful order and using disrespectful language)
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 7, 2002
- Citation
- 0200140
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0200140.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.