The Board denied an increased rating for systolic heart murmur and granted service connection for a skin disorder (claimed as chloracne), but the latter was reopened based on new evidence. The decision is mixed, with some issues being granted and others not.
The deciding factor: New evidence submitted since April 1975 did not show that the veteran's pre-existing skin disorder increased in severity during service.
- Claimed conditions
- Systolic Heart Murmur, Acne (claimed as chloracne)
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 10, 2002
- Citation
- 0200360
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0200360.
What this means for you
A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection due to pre-decisional error and insufficient medical opinions regarding the Veteran's heart condition, hypertension, and hearing loss/tinnitus.
- Granted
The Veteran's systolic heart murmur was rated at 30% effective March 2, 2011. His anxiety disorder remains at the highest possible rating of 70%. The Board granted a higher rating for his heart murmur based on new evidence showing it is more severe than previously assessed.
- Granted
The Veteran's service-connected systolic heart murmur was found to be productive of a workload of greater than 7 METs but not greater than 10 METs, resulting in dyspnea, fatigue, angina, dizziness, or syncope. Continuous medication was also required from March 2, 2011, leading to a 30 percent rating.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.