The Board has determined that the appellant's failure to report her SSA income contributed to the creation of an overpayment. The Committee on Waivers and Compromises (Committee) found no indication of fraud, misrepresentation or bad faith on the part of the appellant. After considering all factors, including fault, undue hardship, and changing position, the Board concluded that recovery would be against the principles of equity and good conscience.
The deciding factor: The appellant's failure to report her SSA income contributed to the creation of an overpayment, which was at fault on her part. The Committee found no indication of fraud, misrepresentation or bad faith on the appellant's part. After considering all factors, including fault, undue hardship, and changing position, the Board concluded that recovery would be against the principles of equity and good conscience.
- Claimed conditions
- Not specified in this decision
- How they argued it
- Not specified
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 14, 2002
- Citation
- 0200468
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0200468.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.