The Board denied the veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his service-connected internal hemorrhoids, status post hemorrhoidectomy, finding that the evidence did not show persistent bleeding with secondary anemia or fissures to warrant a higher rating.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence did not show persistent bleeding with secondary anemia or fissures, which are required for a higher evaluation under Diagnostic Code 7336.
- Claimed conditions
- Internal Hemorrhoids
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- January 15, 2002
- Citation
- 0200574
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0200574.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's internal hemorrhoids and chronic low back strain have been rated, but the Board has remanded for further evaluation due to additional issues. The Veteran is also seeking service connection for sleep disability and TDIU.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claims for service connection for a gastric ulcer and gastroesophageal reflux disorder (GERD) have been denied.,The Veteran's claim for service connection for internal hemorrhoids has been remanded for further development.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal for increased disability ratings for his service-connected bilateral knee degenerative joint disease was denied. The case is now remanded to address the issue of service connection for internal hemorrhoids, which is secondary to his existing disabilities.
- Denied
The Board has determined that SMC based on the need for regular aid and attendance for the Veteran's spouse is not warranted due to her functional capacity, which does not require personal assistance from others.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.