The Board found that earlier detection of the peptic ulcer by VA medical personnel would not have changed the ultimate course of the veteran's disease and resulting disability, and thus benefits pursuant to the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for additional gastrointestinal disability caused by failure of VA medical personnel to diagnose his peptic ulcer at the time of treatment in the early 1970s are not warranted.
The deciding factor: The Board concluded that earlier detection and diagnosis would not have altered the course or outcome of the veteran's disease, leading to no additional disability.
- Claimed conditions
- peptic ulcer
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- January 16, 2002
- Citation
- 0200623
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0200623.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Partly granted
The Veteran's appeal includes claims for service connection for a peptic ulcer and an initial rating for his right shoulder disability. The Board has remanded the issues of service connection for the peptic ulcer and the right shoulder disability, while denying an increased rating for the right shoulder disability and remanding the issue of effective date for TDIU prior to January 4, 2014.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to new evidence received since the November 2023 SSOC, and for an addendum VA opinion regarding the etiology of the Veteran's gastrointestinal disorder.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for hypertension and erectile dysfunction, both presumed to be due to herbicide exposure. The claims for hypertrophy of the prostate, migraine headaches, and peptic ulcer were remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the matter for an adequate VA examination and to obtain missing treatment records.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.