The Board has determined that the veteran's skin disorders, including cysts, were not incurred as a result of service and are not related to herbicide exposure. The claim for an increased rating for PTSD is also denied.
The deciding factor: There was no evidence linking the veteran's skin conditions or PTSD to his military service or herbicide exposure.
- Claimed conditions
- Skin Disorders, Cysts
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- May 17, 2002
- Citation
- 0204698
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0204698.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case for further development and readjudication due to a failure to report for a VA examination, conflicting medical evidence of record, and issues related to secondary service connection.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for an initial rating in excess of 70 percent for PTSD, service connection for bilateral hearing loss, stomach ulcers, and a skin disorder due to incomplete development. The Veteran's VA treatment records need to be obtained, as well as addendum opinions addressing his lay statements regarding symptom onset.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal is being remanded due to a withdrawal of the cysts claim and for additional development regarding his PTSD claim.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for service connection for a disability other than chloracne and manifested by acne, cysts, and scars from cyst removal was denied. The claim for an earlier effective date for the grant of service connection for chloracne was also denied.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.