Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Dismissed

The Board dismissed the appeals due to the appellant not filing an adequate substantive appeal within the required time frame.

The deciding factor: The veteran did not file a timely and adequate substantive appeal for his claims regarding increased rating, separate disability evaluations, SMC, or TDIU.

Claimed conditions
left nephrolithiasis, lithotripsy, left ureteropelvic obstruction, post ureteroplasty, hydronephrosis, arterial hypertension, right bundle branch block, post coronary artery bypass
How they argued it
Direct service connection
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
June 14, 2002
Citation
0206325

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0206325.

What this means for you

A dismissal means the Board did not decide the issue on its merits — usually because it was withdrawn or had become moot. It says more about procedure than about whether a claim like this can win.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.