The veteran's shell fragment wounds and associated scars have been evaluated based on their current manifestations. The Board has determined that the evidence does not support a compensable evaluation prior to September 24, 2001 for either condition or scar. For conditions rated under Diagnostic Codes 7804 (scar) and 5309 (hand), no higher evaluations are warranted as there is no evidence of pain, instability, or functional impairment that would justify a compensable evaluation.
The deciding factor: The veteran's shell fragment wounds have not been shown to be productive of symptoms such as tenderness, pain, or other symptomatology prior to September 24, 2001. The scar has also not demonstrated any signs of instability, pain, or functional impairment that would warrant a higher evaluation.
- Claimed conditions
- Shell Fragment Wound of the Chin, Shell Fragment Wound of the Right Hand with Contracture of the Right 5th Finger
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 18, 2002
- Citation
- 0206469
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0206469.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the issue of entitlement to service connection for a back disability due to a duty to assist error, specifically regarding VA's failure to provide the Veteran with a VA examination prior to the rating decision.
- Granted
The Board granted a 50 percent rating for the Veteran's migraine headaches based on prostrating attacks occurring more than once a month and severe economic inadaptability.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's appeal for special monthly compensation based on loss of use of his left foot, as there was no evidence showing that the service-connected conditions resulted in functional limitation equal to that of amputation of the left foot with prosthesis.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.