The VA has determined that the veteran does not have an additional cardiovascular disorder as a result of VA medical treatment, and thus his claim for compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 is denied.
The deciding factor: A January 2000 VA medical opinion concluded there was no clear evidence of any lasting exacerbation due to the veteran's reaction to a calcium channel blocker in 1992, and thus his treatment with calcium channel blockers did not permanently aggravate his heart disease.
- Claimed conditions
- Cardiovascular disorder
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- June 25, 2002
- Citation
- 0206802
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0206802.
What this means for you
A final Board denial may be appealed to the U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims, generally within 120 days of the Board mailing date. A Supplemental Claim with new and relevant evidence is a separate option. Another Higher-Level Review of the Board decision is not available. Check your own notice: this historical decision does not set your deadline.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board denied entitlement to accrued benefits and DIC benefits under 38 U.S.C. § 1318 because the Veteran did not meet the statutory requirements. The Board remanded entitlement to service connection for cause of death and survivor's pension benefits to obtain a medical opinion on whether the Veteran's service-connected PTSD aggravated his sleep apnea.
- Whole decision: Partly granted
The Board denied service connection for a bilateral ear disorder and remanded the remaining issues for further development.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has granted service connection for hypertension and a cardiovascular disorder, finding that the conditions are due to herbicide exposure during service. The Veteran's type II diabetes mellitus is also service-connected.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Veteran's non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is granted service connection under the PACT Act due to exposure to burn pits. Service connection for a cardiovascular disorder is denied as there is no evidence of its onset during active service or being related to his service.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.