The Board has granted an effective date of February 16, 1994 for the grant of disability benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a cerebrovascular accident with homonymous hemianopsia resulting from VA medical treatment.
The deciding factor: The award was based on the liberalized holding in Gardner v. Derwinski, which implemented changes to the regulation implementing 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 effective November 25, 1991, and applied retroactively to February 16, 1994.
- Claimed conditions
- Cerebrovascular accident with homonymous hemianopsia
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- June 28, 2002
- Citation
- 0207061
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0207061.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Granted
The Board found no clear and unmistakable error in denying disability benefits under the provisions of 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for a cerebrovascular accident with homonymous hemianopsia, which occurred as a result of VA medical treatment.
- Granted
The Board has granted an effective date of February 16, 1994 for the award of disability benefits under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for residuals of a cerebrovascular accident with homonymous hemianopsia and heart disability as the result of VA medical treatment.
- Denied
The Board denied the veteran's claims for increased ratings for his service-connected lumbar myositis, psychoneurosis and conversion hysteria, residuals of shrapnel wounds of the left thigh and pelvis with retained foreign bodies and scars, and residuals of shell fragment wounds of the right thigh and left leg. The veteran was also denied entitlement to a total disability rating based on individual unemployability due to service-connected disabilities.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claim for an initial evaluation in excess of 10 percent for his service-connected coronary artery disease, finding that the evidence did not support a higher rating based on the severity of his condition.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.