The Board found that the August 1981 rating decision did not involve clear and unmistakable error in assigning a 10 percent evaluation for multiple non-compensable service-connected disabilities, with an effective date of May 15, 1981. The veteran's claim was denied.
The deciding factor: The Board determined that the August 1981 rating decision correctly applied the regulations concerning effective dates and did not involve any error, much less clear and unmistakable error (CUE).
- Claimed conditions
- gunshot wound to the left wrist, fracture of the left fifth metatarsal, gunshot wound scar to the right upper back (shoulder) and right cheek
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- 10%
- Decision date
- July 2, 2002
- Citation
- 0207206
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0207206.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's claim for a compensable rating for his right testicular disorder was denied. The Board found no factual basis for an increased rating as there is no lay or medical evidence of atrophy of both testes that would justify such a rating.
- Denied
The Board denied the Veteran's claims for an initial compensable rating for a fracture of the left fifth metatarsal and service connection for a dental disability, including a broken tooth. The evidence did not meet the criteria for a compensable rating or service connection under applicable VA regulations.
- Denied
The Veteran's service-connected fracture of the left fifth metatarsal has not been manifested by symptoms warranting a compensable rating.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an increased evaluation for his service-connected left foot disability was denied. The Board found that the evidence did not support a rating in excess of 30 percent, but granted a separate 10 percent rating for degenerative arthritis.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.