The veteran's cystitis with irritable voiding syndrome is manifested by a need to wear absorbent materials that must be changed more than four times per day, warranting a 60 percent rating.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence shows the veteran requires the use of an appliance or the wearing of absorbent material which must be changed more than 4 times per day for his cystitis with irritable voiding syndrome.
- Claimed conditions
- Cystitis, Irritable Voiding Syndrome
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 10, 2002
- Citation
- 0207574
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0207574.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board granted compensation under 38 U.S.C. § 1151 for bladder cancer and erectile dysfunction, as well as radiation proctitis, rectitis, and cystitis, anal stricture, worsened anal fissures, and chronic anal fissure, caused by VA care.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the claims for service connection for a sinus disorder, kidney disorder, and cystitis due to inadequate medical opinions based on the absence of in-service diagnoses or complaints. The Veteran is required to undergo VA examinations to determine the etiology of these conditions.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to insufficient medical opinions regarding whether the Veteran's bladder cancer was related to his service-connected prostatitis with cystitis, and if he had chronic cystitis at the time of his diagnosis.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to lack of substantial compliance with its previous remand directives. The Veteran's claims for cervical spine disability, cystitis, and kidney disability are being reviewed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.