The Board has determined that the veteran's HIV-related illness warrants an initial evaluation of 30 percent, effective from December 4, 1993.
The deciding factor: The VA examination and treatment records consistently showed a CD4 count above 200, which is not indicative of recurrent constitutional symptoms or intermittent diarrhea. The veteran was on approved medications but had not demonstrated pathological weight loss or development of HIV-related opportunistic infection or neoplasm.
- Claimed conditions
- Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-related illness
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating
- Not verified here — check the original decision
- Decision date
- July 22, 2002
- Citation
- 0208209
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Search VA.gov for the original decision (opens in a new tab) using citation 0208209.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board allowed the benefit or issue identified in this decision. Review the original order: other issues in the same appeal may have a different outcome, and this decision does not predict another claim.
What you can do next
Use your own notice and decision stage. A remanded issue is not a final court-appealable denial. VA review guidance and CAVC filing instructions (U.S. federal; reviewed October 7, 2026).
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Whole decision: Granted
The Board has determined that the Veteran's HIV-related illness began during his active service and grants the claim for service connection.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's claim for an earlier effective date for HIV-related illness was denied as the earliest possible effective date is August 4, 1986, which is the day following his separation from active service.
- Whole decision: Denied
The Veteran's HIV-related illness is currently rated at 30 percent, and the Board finds that it does not meet the criteria for a higher rating.
- Whole decision: Remanded (sent back)
The Board has decided to remand the case for additional development, including a new VA examination to assess the current severity of the Veteran's HIV-related illness and determine whether his tongue lesion represents an opportunistic infection or neoplasm.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.