The veteran is entitled to disability compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151 for multiple intracranial hemorrhages and left frontal intraparenchymal hematoma resulting in a left frontoparietal craniotomy, as these conditions were caused by VA medical treatment. The abdominal aortic aneurysm with bilateral iliac artery aneurysms and left popliteal artery aneurysm did not result from VA examination or treatment.
The deciding factor: The multiple intracranial hemorrhages and left frontal intraparenchymal hematoma resulting in the craniotomy were caused by VA medical treatment, while the abdominal aortic aneurysm with bilateral iliac artery aneurysms and left popliteal artery aneurysm did not result from VA examination or treatment.
- Claimed conditions
- Abdominal aortic aneurysm, Bilateral iliac artery aneurysms, Left popliteal artery aneurysm, Multiple intracranial hemorrhages, Left frontal intraparenchymal hematoma
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 9, 2002
- Citation
- 0209584
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0209584.
What this means for you
A grant means the Board agreed the veteran was entitled to the benefit. Decisions like this show the kind of evidence and arguments that tend to succeed for claims like it.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claim for service connection of the cause of the Veteran's death to correct duty to assist errors that occurred prior to the August 2023 decision on appeal.
- Denied
The Veteran's claim for an initial compensable rating for abdominal aortic aneurysm was denied, and his appeal for service connection for deformity of the penis due to circumcision was dismissed.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to incomplete records and a need for an adequate medical opinion regarding whether VA treatment was feasibly available at the time of the private treatment on May 19, 2010.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has remanded the case due to a lack of recent VA examination and missing treatment records. The Veteran's thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms need to be reassessed.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.