Veterans’ RightsAn independent resource for veterans
← All decisions
Partly granted

The Board denied reopening the claim due to lack of new and material evidence, but also noted that the appellant's intoxication at the time of the accident was not addressed in the previous decision.

The deciding factor: New and material evidence has been submitted, but it does not address whether the appellant was intoxicated at the time of his accident, which is a critical issue for determining line-of-duty status.

Claimed conditions
C2 fracture with spinal cord injury
How they argued it
Reopened with new and material evidence
Exposure basis
None
Rating assigned
None in this decision
Decision date
August 13, 2002
Citation
0209733

This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0209733.

What this means for you

A partial grant means some issues were granted while others were denied or remanded — common in multi-issue claims. Look at which issues went which way, and how each was argued.

What you can do next

Related decisions

Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.

Free starter guide for your own claim

Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.

We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.

We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.

This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.