The Board previously denied the veteran's petition to reopen his claim for service connection for a foot disorder. The U.S. Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims has ordered the case remanded due to procedural issues, and the veteran now wants a travel Board hearing.
The deciding factor: The veteran requested a travel Board hearing after initially preferring a video-conference hearing.
- Claimed conditions
- foot disorder
- How they argued it
- Reopened with new and material evidence
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- August 27, 2002
- Citation
- 0210573
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0210573.
What this means for you
A remand is not a loss. The Board sent the case back for more development — often a new exam or missing records — before making a final decision. Many remands later end in a grant, and the decision spells out exactly what the Board wanted to see.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Dismissed
The Board dismissed the appeal for chronic bronchitis as untimely and denied service connection for various other conditions including a left ankle disorder, asthma, shoulder disorder, chest disorder, foot disorder, GI disorder, hand disorder, knee disorder, and neck disorder due to lack of evidence supporting their direct relation to service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board remands the claims for service connection for a foot disorder, left hip disorder, and right hip disorder due to pre-decisional duty to assist errors.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for a right thumb scar status post laceration and readjudicated the claims of entitlement to service connection for various disorders, finding new and relevant evidence in some cases.
- Partly granted
The Board granted service connection for tinnitus and remanded the remaining claims on appeal due to missing service treatment records that were later located.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.