The Board found that the veteran's right eye impairment and vision loss were not caused by negligence or fault on the part of VA in furnishing surgical treatment, and thus denied compensation under 38 U.S.C.A. § 1151.
The deciding factor: The medical evidence established that the right eye impairment to include vision loss was due to corneal scarring as a result of herpes simplex viral metaherpetic disease, not the March 1997 cataract surgery performed by VA.
- Claimed conditions
- Right Eye Impairment, Vision Loss
- How they argued it
- Direct service connection
- Exposure basis
- None
- Rating assigned
- None in this decision
- Decision date
- September 19, 2002
- Citation
- 0212480
This is a plain-language summary generated by AI from a public Board of Veterans’ Appeals decision. It can contain errors — always verify against the original. Look up the original decision on VA.gov (opens in a new tab) using citation 0212480.
What this means for you
A denial is a starting point, not the end of the road. You can see why this claim fell short — and, if you are still inside the one-year window, the appeal lanes that may remain open to you.
What you can do next
Related decisions
Other Board decisions on a similar condition or argued the same way.
- Denied
The Board has determined that the Veteran's bilateral eye disability, including vision loss and cataracts, did not have its onset during active-duty service and is not otherwise etiologically related to his service.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Board has determined that the Veteran's right knee disability, vision loss and light sensitivity, and bilateral hearing loss are related to service. However, due to a lack of examination for these conditions, the case is being remanded.
- Remanded (sent back)
The Veteran's appeal for an increased evaluation of PTSD from March 12, 2010, is denied. The Board also remanded the issue of service connection for vision loss due to insufficient evidence.
- Denied
The Board denied service connection for bilateral hearing loss, diabetes mellitus type II (due to herbicide exposure), tinnitus, heart disability, hypertension, neuropathy of upper and lower extremities, psychiatric disorder, vision loss, and erectile dysfunction. The appeal is granted only in relation to the reopening of the claim for diabetes mellitus type II.
Free starter guide for your own claim
Reading this because you were denied or under-rated? Get the plain-English next steps — your appeal options, the deadline that protects you, and how appeals like yours turn out. One email, no spam.
We will only use this to send the guide. No spam, unsubscribe any time. We never sell your information.
We are not the VA. Veterans’ Rights is an independent resource built for veterans. We are not the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs, not part of the government, and not endorsed by any government agency.
This is general information, not legal advice. For advice about your own situation, talk to a VA-accredited representative — many help for free.